For years, OEMs have evaluated digital tools the same way: feature lists, integrations, and technical specifications.
.png?width=677&height=376&name=02%20-%20How%20Industry%205.0%20changes%20the%20way%20-1%20(1).png)
That approach made sense in the era of Industry 4.0, where the focus was automation, connectivity, and efficiency at scale.
But Industry 5.0 changes the rules.
As manufacturing enters a more human-centric phase, the question is no longer “what can this tool do?” It’s “how does this tool help people do their jobs better?”
From Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: a shift in evaluation mindset
Industry 5.0 reframes digital transformation around three principles:
-
Human-centricity
-
Resilience
-
Sustainability
For OEMs, this has a direct impact on how digital tools should be evaluated.
Tools are no longer judged only on technical capability. They are judged on real-world usefulness, especially in environments where people operate under pressure.
This shift is forcing leaders to rethink long-standing evaluation habits.
.png?width=646&height=359&name=How%20Industry%205.0%20changes%20the%20way%20-2%20(1).png)
Why feature checklists fall short in Industry 5.0
Feature-based evaluation assumes that:
-
More capability equals more value
-
Users will adapt to the system
-
Adoption will follow implementation
In reality, many OEMs already own powerful tools that:
-
Are underused
-
Requires heavy training
-
Live outside day-to-day workflows
-
Add admin rather than remove it
Industry 5.0 exposes the flaw in feature checklists: capability without usability creates friction, not value.
A tool can be technically impressive and still fail the workforce.
Evaluating digital tools under real operating conditions
Industry 5.0 asks a different question: Does this tool work when people are busy, distracted, or under pressure?
OEM environments are rarely calm or controlled. Teams are:
- Working against time
- Dealing with product complexity
- Operating across languages, skill levels, and locations
- Expected to get things right first time
.png?width=375&height=345&name=Copy%20of%20How%20Industry%205.0%20changes%20the%20way%20-2%20(1).png)
Tools that succeed in Industry 5.0:
-
Reduce cognitive load
-
Remove interpretation
-
Support learning in the flow of work
-
Make the right action obvious
If a tool only works when users slow down and read instructions carefully, it’s already misaligned with reality.
Start with your KPIs
A human-centric evaluation begins with clarity on what you are trying to improve.
Common OEM KPIs include:
-
Reducing waste and rework costs
-
Faster onboarding and time-to-competency
-
Fewer errors in assembly, service, or parts identification
-
Less dependency on tribal knowledge
-
Lower admin overhead
-
Greater consistency across internal teams, dealers, and partners - having a single source of truth
For example:
-
In industries working with expensive materials such as leather or suede, a single mistake can be costly
-
In aftersales and service, incorrect parts identification leads to returns, delays, and dissatisfied customers
-
In manufacturing and assembly, unclear instructions create rework, scrap, and downtime
The right digital tools should directly support these outcomes, not sit adjacent to them.
Adoption vs capability: the Industry 5.0 reality check
One of the most important shifts Industry 5.0 introduces is this:
A tool only delivers value if people actually use it.
Many OEMs already have systems with impressive capability but low adoption across:
-
Shop floor teams
-
Field service technicians
-
Dealers and distributors
High-adoption tools share common traits.
.png?width=720&height=400&name=Copy%20of%2002%20-%20How%20Industry%205.0%20changes%20the%20way%20-1%20(2).png)
Why usability matters more than integrations
Integrations still matter, but Industry 5.0 flips the priority order. A perfectly integrated system that people avoid creates more complexity, not less.
Leaders are increasingly asking:
-
Can people use this without constant support?
-
Does this reduce or increase day-to-day effort?
-
Does it replace work, or add another layer on top?
Human-centric tools:
-
Make the right information available at the right moment
-
Reduce context-switching
-
Replace manual work rather than documenting it
Usability is no longer a “nice to have”. It is a core evaluation criterion.
What Industry 5.0-aligned tools look like in practice
In practical terms, Industry 5.0-aligned tools focus on supporting execution, not just managing data. For many OEMs, this is where visual, interactive systems are gaining traction.
Examples include:
-
Visual work instructions that guide people step by step through tasks
-
Interactive electronic parts catalogs that reduce guesswork and misidentification
-
Single sources of truth that keep teams aligned without tedious manual updates
.gif?width=1920&height=1080&name=Workful%20Video%20Mock%20Up%20(1).gif)
Platforms like Partful are designed around this principle, enabling OEMs to create and maintain visual, interactive 3D work instructions and parts catalogues from a single source of product data.
Rather than expecting people to interpret complex documentation, these tools:
-
Show what needs to be done
-
Support learning while working
-
Reduce reliance on individual experience
This is human-centric manufacturing in action.
Partful